Auditors third party liability
Attempts to exclude or limit liability for negligence by means of a contractual term such as in an engagement letter or a notice such as in an audit opinion letter which is reproduced in the accounts are subject to a test of reasonableness under section 2 2 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act UCTA The danger of a duty being imposed will be increased where that third party has no other source of advice and where the purpose of the accountant's work is to induce the third party to take the particular action he has taken". Put another way, such a disclaimer should be enough to prevent the maker of the statement from being taken to have assumed responsibility to the third party. However, the Donoghue case is applicable to physical injuries only; not one jurisdiction has applied the doctrine of Donoghue case to auditors. Rosenblum, Inc. The adviser knows, or ought to know, the other person will rely on the advice. Although auditors may well include in their audit engagement letters restrictions on the persons to whom the company may provide the audit report or for what purpose, they have not to date included in their audit opinion letters a disclaimer of liability to third parties, even though neither the Act nor auditing standards prohibit it. Moreover, the loss in this case was not one which arose out of the mismanagement of ERF but the dishonest acts of Mr Ellis, including statements of Mr Ellis during the course of the negotiations in respect of the sale of the company. If all the customers reply with positive responses meaning they confirm that they owe your client the amounts shown in accounts receivable , you have enough persuasive evidence to issue an opinion on the accuracy of the overall accounts receivable balance No convincing evidence is not always pefecrt evidence. These establish the principles for auditor liability to clients and to third parties, respectively. It is plausible that this reduces the credibility of the audit report in the eyes of the reader. Whether or not a disclaimer of an auditor's liability for negligence in giving an opinion on the accounts is reasonable will depend on all the circumstances: factors of particular importance will include the 'nature and quality' of the auditor's negligence, the comparative resources of the parties, the availability of insurance, the nature of the transaction, the scale of potential loss and the fees paid.
Credit Alliance v. Disclaimers of this type are used to enable companies to carry on their business without being exposed to unacceptable levels of uninsurable risk. Perhaps the most obvious is not being negligent in the first place.
The third party would be likely to act in reliance on that report, thus running the risk of suffering loss if the statement was negligently prepared. An auditor is not bound to be a detective, or, as was said, to approach his work with suspicion or with a foregone conclusion that there is something wrong.
It may even be felt that the inclusion of a disclaimer of liability to a particular class of persons could in some circumstances be more of a hindrance than a help: it could establish the foreseeability of particular damage, or a relationship of proximity to that class, but could nevertheless be held void for unreasonableness; pressure from clients: since clients expect the audited accounts to provide third parties with some assurance as to the 'accuracy' of the company's accounts, they may well feel that a disclaimer of liability to third parties undermines this assurance; and reluctance to provide an excuse to increase the potential liability of auditors through legislation.
Auditors liabilities pdf
Foreseeability of damage; 2. However, courts thus far have ruled that Section of Restatement does not impose a public duty. Your firm has audited ABC for the last four years. The potential costs and risks of auditing large, listed businesses may now be prohibitive for any firm of willing auditors outside of the Big Four. He is a watch-dog, but not a bloodhoundhe is entitled to assume that they tried the servants of the company are honest, and to rely on their representations. Managing exposure to liability Audit quality There are a number of ways in which audit firms can manage their exposure to claims of negligence. Under contract law parties can seek remedy for a breach of contractual obligations. This means that even if there are multiple culpable parties in a negligence case the plaintiff may pursue any one of those parties individually for the entire damages sought. In Caparo, the House of Lords clarified that the auditors' statutory duty is owed to the members as a body, to enable them to exercise class rights in general meeting for example, to approve or disapprove the election or re-election of directors, or the appointment or reappointment of the auditors , but not to individual shareholders or the public at large who may rely on the accounts when deciding whether or not to invest in the company. Therefore, the auditors were in breach of their duty to act with care and skill. Mere belief that a person would rely on that statement or report did not constitute making a statement to that person with the intention of inducing that person to act in a particular way.
The banking facility was provided on the basis of receiving audited financial statements each year. Liability Limitation Agreements Since auditors have been permitted, under the terms of the Companies Act, to use Liability Limitation Agreements LLAs to reduce the threat of litigation from clients.
Liabilities of an auditor slideshare
Privity means a contract or specific agreement exists between two parties. However, the case also illustrates that liability will depend on the particular facts in each case: where these differ in any material respect from the situation in Al Saudi Banque a different conclusion could conceivably be reached. V Heller and Partners Ltd ; English The case involved a bank, but the principles established had implications for accountants and auditors. The ICAEW's paper on 'Managing the professional liability of accountants' warns accountants that "it would be prudent to assume that a duty of care will exist in a situation where the accountant knows of the existence of a third party whom he reasonably expects to receive and rely on the accountant's work for a particular transaction or purpose and to whom damage will be caused if the work has been done negligently. To register for Law-Now, please go to www. The principle of this case would apply to auditors only if they hold themselves out to be experts and are in the business of giving advice. USA Ultramares Corporation v.
Taking into account expert evidence in relation to the extent of reliance that may be placed on audited accounts, Rolfe J indicated he relied on a commonsense approach, the prevailing community standards, and perception in relation to audited accounts.
based on 17 review