Beard thesis an economic interpretation
We have to understand the impact of the American Revolution on class conflict.
However after the Revolution, he argued, and freedom was won, the men in power wanted now to have laws designed to protect their wealth. Who Was Charles Beard?
The leaders who supported the Constitution in the ratifying conventions represented the same economic groups as the members of the Philadelphia Convention; and in a large number of instances they were also directly and personally interested in the outcome of their efforts.
Rather, they were motived by their own economic self interest. However, these were but one factor that led to the eventual outcome, and other factors, including ideological beliefs, the effects on constituents, and more nuanced and distributed financial and economic concerns also played a role.
This book was pretty controversial.
Those who are creditors, and those who are debtors, fall under a like discrimination, A landed interest, a manufacturing interest, a mercantile interest, a moneyed interest, with many lesser interests, grow up of necessity in civilized nations and divide them into different classes, actuated by different sentiments and views.
He was educated at Oxford University and Columbia University. The Constitution was ratified by a vote of probably not more than one-sixth of the adult males.
Beard history of the united states
Property also plays a decisive role in the doctrine of subsidiarity, the idea that social problems ought to be resolved by the closest available social institution. The American Revolution in its day was a pretty radical event. This book was pretty controversial. To the extent he means to accuse them of exploiting the Constitutional process to protect their personal assets, he is clearly wrong. What he overlooks is the decisive role the protection of property played in republican theory as a bulwark against political abuse. Becker had argued the American Revolution really consisted of two revolutions: one against Great Britain for independence and the other a conflict to decide who should rule in the absence of British authority. In formulating this interpretation, Beard drew from the scholarship of another famous historian named Carl L. However after the Revolution, he argued, and freedom was won, the men in power wanted now to have laws designed to protect their wealth. Barker, Philip Crowl, Richard P. Constitution was adopted in order to protect the rights and interests of the wealthy, upper-class members of society. Beard conceived the Constitution as stemming from a class conflict between wealthy landowners and common farmers. The leaders who supported the Constitution in the ratifying conventions represented the same economic groups as the members of the Philadelphia Convention; and in a large number of instances they were also directly and personally interested in the outcome of their efforts. More specifically, Beard contends that the Constitutional Convention was attended by, and the Constitution was therefore written by, a "cohesive" elite seeking to protect its personal property especially federal bonds and economic standing. In , said Beard, the farmers and debtors, led by plantation slaveowners, overthrew the capitalists and established Jeffersonian democracy. In the left-leaning climate of the s, it had become widely accepted.
based on 82 review